April 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Search


Archives
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Meta

Get Firefox!

Entertainment and the Suburban Condition

Finally (!) delving back into Robert Putnam's Bowling Alone, I want to dig into a phenomenon that Putnam argues is the most significant shaping influence in terms of social capital in modern American life - namely, electronic forms of entertainment and, specifically, television. This particular chapter of the book is both enlightening and depressing, if not entirely surprising. Putnam offers devastating analysis and commentary that relentlessly links television with civic disengagement in measure after measure. In conclusion, he writes:

Americans at the end of the twentieth century were watching more TV, watching it more habitually, more pervasively, and more often alone, and watching more programs that were associated specifically with civic disengagement (entertainment, as distinct from news). The onset of these trends coincided exactly with the national decline in social connectedness, and the trends are most marked among the younger generations that are...distinctively disengaged. Moreover, it is precisely those Americans most marked by this dependence on televised entertainment who were most likely to have dropped out of civic and social life - who spent less time with friends, were less involved in community organizations, and were less likely to participate in public affairs. (p. 246)
I suppose I should be clear that what Putnam is discussing here -and in the book generally speaking - is not in any way isolated to suburbanites. Obviously the influence of electronic media pervades all demographics and communities in our society. Putnam, in fact, relates a story from a town in northern Canada where, due to a topological anomaly, television signals were unavailable until the mid-1970's. This community was studied alongside two neighboring communities that had ready access to television signals. Once television became available, this community demonstrated an immediate, measurable decline in residents' participation in community activities. The other two communities were used as a control to demonstrate that the only variable in play was, in fact, television.

But my concern is specifically with the way in which electronic media interact with suburban culture. I'm convinced that there is a reciprocal relationship between the isolating effects of suburban geography, the counter-competent effects of chronic outsourcing, and the demotivating effects of electronic entertainment. Put simply - these three elements of suburban life reduce the ability, desire, and personal connections needed to make meaningful change in ourselves and our communities. An example perhaps will help to clarify what I mean - take sports, basketball for instance, something that I used to play regularly with friends in high school and college. I haven't played basketball in years, and if I thought of starting again, I'd face three hurdles: it's easier to get my basketball "fix" by flipping over to ESPN, lack of play has atrophied my skills (such as they were), and I don't know anyone else in my neighborhood who would like to get together for a few hoops. There it is - isolation, outsourcing, and entertainment all combine to keep me off the courts. And if I wanted to translate this into the area of Christian faith - well, I don't think I'd have much difficulty, would I?

But here's what I'm currently starting to wonder - would a change in one of these categories be enough to overcome the inertia that keeps me in a rut (in any particular area of my life, but faith in particular) and push me forward towards action? That's the question that I want to take up next.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by Scott on 12:01 PM in Contextual Theology, Suburbs
Email this post | Bookmark this post on del.icio.us
Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.theopraxis.net/cgi-bin/MT/mt-Ping.cgi/444.

Comments

I am enjoying your thoughts about Putnam's Bowling Alone. It is on my bookshelf as a "will read soon". I think that we all need to seriously look at what we need to do to build social capital -- it is negatively affecting all of our communities (neighborhoods, friendships, faith communities, work teams, etc.) I think the best visual of this net negative social capital is watching teens at the mall -- they are hanging out "together", but they are all texting with someone else, rather than being with the ones that they are "spendindg time with". In general, teens cannot even be bothered to answer their cell phones anymore....what will our net social capital be like when they are in their 30s and 40s? What do we need to do to mentor better social behavior, and is it too late? I don't think it is too late, but I do think it will be a huge undertaking characeterized by many very small yet deliberate actions.

Posted by Tracy on April 2, 2008 09:21 AM

Great basketball analogy, that's exactly my situation as well.

Posted by curtis klope on April 3, 2008 04:44 PM

Greet challenge with a smile. Play your Left shot against your Right. Have fun. Give Thanks. Smile. Practice, practice, practice.

Posted by Jim Loughran on April 4, 2008 12:18 PM

I forget how I ended up subscribed to your blog (the fact that you live in West Philly makes me suspect that we probably have a common acquaintance).... but I just noticed on my feed today that you're reading Bowling Alone. I happen to be in the middle of it myself, and it's great to read your thoughts on it. Another book recommendation that explores the professionalization of community (formal networks, instead of informal) is the Careless Society by John McKnight. He explores it less in a suburban/technology perspective, but more from an inner city economic development view.

Posted by Leighcia on April 9, 2008 10:55 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?