Blog Funk
I think there are three kinds of bloggers: first, there are those who post like mad, chronicling each and every moment and instance of their lives. Or linking to every bit of whatever that someone else has so chronicled. These folks have multiple posts per day and could probably generate daily archives if they so chose. The motto for these folks might be, "More is more." Second, you have folks that post every so often. And, if these folks have been around for a while, they probably post substantive bits that attract attention. Every post is worth reading - but there aren't that many of them, maybe a few a week - and they're fine with that. The motto for these folks is probably, "Less is more." The third kind are the folks who post like the second group but feel the need to post like the first. They feel the lack of content and are self-conscious about it. The motto for these folks is generally, "Less is less." (Ok, there is a group of uber-bloggers who post with the frequency of the first and the substance of the second. They are something more than human. Think Scot McKnight. They have earned the title uber-blogger, and mere mortals cannot aspire to their greatness.)
I definitely fall into the third category. I'm self-conscious about blogging, and I definitely feel the lack when there isn't any new content. I take it personally when people drop subscriptions and whatnot. And I'm self-critical about what I write, going back and tweaking word choices and punctuation in a way that probably borders on OCD. But I'm also not much of a linker - I'd much rather write my own stuff than put up a bunch of links to other people's content. Not that I'm disparaging such by any means - I find the most helpful stuff by following links from people who are good at filtering content. It's just not me.
So I know there's been a lack of stuff here of late. I've got a half-finished series that's sitting on the back burner and I owe another post on a group blog that I was invited to participate in. It's just not there. I don't think I've ever had a funk like this in three and a half years of blogging. In truth, the blog is just one of the symptoms - I'm not reading anything exciting and I'm not really thinking anything original or challenging. I'm at a point where it feels like I'm having the same conversations over and over, and I'm bored with them. Cynicism has been running high of late - part of why I'm not writing much is that I try to leave as much of that off the blog as I can (although it creeps in from time to time anyway). I feel like I've spent a long time trying to hold some things together that I just can't hold any longer, and it's not been pleasant. I am less hopeful for the future of the American church than I have been for a long time. From where I sit, the two primary interpretations of the gospel (depending on the stream in which one swims) seem to be either:
1) You suck, and you need to follow Jesus so that you can suck less. Oh, and vote Republican.Or
2) Don't be mean to people. Oh, and don't vote Republican.To be honest, I'm not buying either. And most other folks around here aren't either, those that haven't downed the Kool-aid anyway. There needs to be something bigger than that - no, that's not accurate. There is something bigger than that, at least in the scriptures I read. I just can't seem to figure out why there's so much difficulty in articulating it. Why do we sell out for such small, pathetic stories? Why is it so hard to read the text and walk away thinking, "The Kingdom has come, and it changes everything?" That, if anything, seems to be pretty straightforward.
I had a great conversation with someone at work recently, talking about social networking and how it could be used to alleviate poverty and bring resources to bear on local issues. And I mentioned that one of the natural venues for such networking to my mind is local faith communities. Her response was that she simply doesn't know enough people who have any interest in church or religion for that to be viable. I suggested that perhaps one reason that folks were tuning out is that religion in America has so often had nothing to say about daily life, about offering resources for doing things like helping the poor in local neighborhoods and about making sense of work and family and connecting faith with how we live in the everyday. I know that's a generalization, but I think it's true to many folks' experiences. And my conversation partner thought it was a valid observation and something to consider, so I take it that it's true to her experience as well. I know that it's true to mine. We're fortunate enough to be a part of a wonderful local church that we absolutely love - but based on a lot of anecdotal evidence that I encounter, I think it's the exception, unfortunately.
I don't know - I need to find something to get the juices flowing again, to generate some excitement and impetus to keep imagining. Right now, it's just not there. And I mean that in a bigger sense than just this little old blog.
I love Google Reader. It’s an invaluable tool for someone like me who’s just too disorganised when it comes to reading these days. It’s great to be able to read blogs/websites like emails, and not have to keep re-visiting to check for...
Received from in other words on June 16, 2007 01:47 PM
Boo-yah. Way to bring it. I like your thoughts. Let's have lunch soon.
Posted by Todd on June 3, 2007 09:32 AMI most definitely fall into your category. I've only been blogging for a couple months and have been somewhat distracted in that time by getting my site up and all, but I definitely feel like I should be posting more.
In response to your observation of the social dichotomy in American Christianity, you should definitely read The Restructuring of American Religion by Robert Wuthnow. It is a history of Christianity in the 20th century and a fascinating read. Of particular interest is the last few chapters where he chronicles how in the last quarter of the 20th century, American christianity has become extremely polarized - to the point where holding a middle position is quite difficult.
Posted by Chris on June 3, 2007 10:03 AMScott,
I certainly can relate to your feelings, and sense of blah with the Church. It certainly can be a drag, and this is something I wrestle with myself from time to time.
Yet, you know as you read the Scriptures the kind of vision God is pouring out for us to help him with (or to jump in on).
For those of us who have eyes to see it, even as blurred as we do because of our human nature, and personal bias, we are still called to help enact this vision in the world.
Interestingly, in my own prayer life, I have been wreslting with something. That is if we in the local church had as many outreaches to the local community (helping with real needs) as we do studies and such, we'd be known as places of salt and light.
Yet, as my Bishop likes to say about Anglicans, is something I think is true of many American Christians in general, "We like our book studies, Bible studies, etc, but we don't do all that much."
It's time to leave the holy huddle and get out there and rub shoulders with the world.
So maybe.. less blogging is ok...if it gets you out there?
Pax,
Father K
Hey Scott,
Well after the demise of Radio Rebellion, I had another false launch with the vox thing, but of course all the while I wanted more. So I worked on learning the Word Press format (because I'm apparently not smart enough to get MT). I now have a new blog where I thought I would be blogging through a book idea, but I am stuck in the less is less sometimes a little more or less. I don't think I can blog about church anymore. There's just nothing left in it for me either.
I read some of the Amber chronicles as a result of lurking around your blog. Thanks for that! I didn't get to finish because school reading had to be and in what a hurry! That Zelazny can write.
I think that Father K is right...the mission left the blog about two years ago. I don't know what these things are for anymore with the notable exception that I wouldn't have exposure to wickedly cool personages such as yourself!
Peace (that's english for Pax ;)
Chris
Posted by Chris on June 4, 2007 07:52 PMtodd - absolutely. I'll drop you an email.
chris - thanks for the recommendation. I'll add it to the list!
K - I hear what you're saying, and I think you're on to something. I don't think it's the blog that's a distraction but rather the whole nature of suburban existence. That's probably a whole post itself - but I do think that the blog malaise is probably a part of a more general staleness that includes a sense of spiritual isolation.
chris - If you haven't read the second series, be aware that the first is far and away superior. It feels like the second series just sort of grinds to a halt, which is disappointing because it starts out pretty strong. Still, he has an interesting way with fiction.
I've always treated this as sort of a place to throw around ideas and get feedback and critique. But for that to work, I need to be generating ideas - and that's just not happening at the moment. Part of me says that I should just write for the discipline of writing - there may be something to that. I suppose the way to find out would be to try it... ;)
Posted by ScottB on June 6, 2007 12:15 AM"I am less hopeful for the future of the American church than I have been for a long time."
I hear ya there... I wish it wasn't so, but that's just how I feel directly related to my experiences.
I unfortunately share your sense of "blah", I just wish that my context was more like yours:
"We're fortunate enough to be a part of a wonderful local church that we absolutely love - but based on a lot of anecdotal evidence that I encounter, I think it's the exception, unfortunately."
I am living your anecdotal exception... I still have hope at this point, it's just a lot less than it was 5 years ago.
Thanks for being so honest about where you're at!
Posted by curtis on June 7, 2007 04:56 PMHey Scott -
I hear you, but I've got to come at it from another angle...with one of hope for a few reasons: because of where I'm at and because of what the church is capable of.
Senses of the 'blah' feeling are a part of this existence where we care so much we get tired of seeing no change and stop caring for a little. But God's story is alive, true, and at work. Because we don't see evidence of it locally or even nationally does not mean it has stopped, it's at work in ways and in places we aren't familiar with.
I've been moved toward the notion suggested by Kevin about living the gospel out, and having the church do the same. In fact, our church philosophy is going through major restructuring because of this heart to be the church, not just to be a church. Being a part of a people that go and do something in the name of Christ and for the Kingdom is empowering and invigorating. Meeting together once a week without action coming from our belief makes for impotent religion and we ought to give up our right to talk about it if we aren't actively moving toward it. Anything else is a complaining session about society and what the church is not.
What motivates me the most is when I'm inspired by what a church is doing. What gets my anger stirred up is talking about what the church is not, or about the various failings of the Christian church...and there are many.
What is positive in all this is conversation. What we must be wary of is apathy because of what we don't see or what the larger body is not. Remember that throughout the story it's been about a remnant of folks returning to God. It takes a prophetic voice. It takes prophetic action, meaning putting into practice the burdens we have for the church, if only on a personal level.
I could post on our church and where we're going with this whole thing, but this has gotten long enough. But just insight into where we're going...we're looking at working alongside of social services, schools, etc. Our heart is not to be a separate entity, but to be a part of the Kingdom of God wherever its at work.
Blessings to you all as we continue to wrestle with these things. As far as reading, not sure how you feel about Rob Bell, but got done with Velvit Elvis and loved it. His podcast is good as well. If you go to it, check out the sermon "Wine and Heaven." Take care all...
Posted by Jnolt on June 8, 2007 01:53 PMcurtis - thanks for the thoughts and encouragement!
josh - hey bro, good to hear from you. I think there's a lot of wisdom in what you're saying. I'm just not experiencing it at the moment. And I need to keep that in mind - that there are others who are - and that there is more going on quietly and graciously than is happening publicly and negatively.
Thanks man - hope all is well with the family. I owe you an email or two. ;)
Posted by ScottB on June 11, 2007 12:12 AMI agree - Scot McKnight's Jesus Creed blog is the gold standard of Christian blogging, and all the rest of us pale in comparison. But as I've commented on his blog, I think the danger for all the rest of us is to try to blog like Scot, when really our calling may well be to blog quite differently. I simply can't be one of these folks who reads everything and links to everything, and I can't post every day. But I feel like I have something to say a couple of times a week, and that's enough for me. We need to be cautious about celebrity-ism and copycatting, even in the Christian blogosphere, when really it all boils down to a sense of vocation and calling and blogging in such a way as is appropriate to who we are.
Posted by Al Hsu on June 12, 2007 10:20 AMAl - I agree; I've long ago accepted the fact that I'll never be a daily blogger, for exactly the reasons that you state. Lately, though, I've been quiet even for me! ;)
Posted by ScottB on June 12, 2007 11:39 PM
