November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Search


Archives
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Meta

Get Firefox!

A Theology of the Suburbs (p. 7)

I'm going to endeavor to wrap this series up in short order here - I've been mulling on a lot of stuff for a while now, and it's time for me to put my thoughts in order. For a quick review of where I'm heading, my summary post is here; all of the posts can be found here. I want to begin by tackling the question of the dominance of economics in the suburban ethos.

One question that I asked previously that still keeps me up at night is this: who is telling the stories that shape the imaginations of those in suburban contexts? This question is the reason that I've chosen to begin here. The pursuit of happiness may be the central concern of the suburban ethos, but the economic sphere provides the system of meaning in which the question of happiness is asked. This means, simply, that the way in which suburbanites think about happiness is primarily defined in terms of economics. And, consequently, the stories that we tell, the metaphors that we use, the very structures of our thinking are constantly being shaped by economic forces - marketing, employers, merchants, educators, and so on. In short, human worth is derived from the ability to produce and consume. Through the surrender of our imaginations to the Market, we become little more that units of production or members of a market segment - mere cogs in the wheel of commerce.

Our narrative response must begin here, with the recovery of a robust theology of the imago dei. For an absolutely wonderful treatment of this subject, I have to again plug Richard Middleton's The Liberating Image. Middleton suggests that the concept of the image of God in Genesis has its origins primarily in two ancient customs: the practice of kings setting up representations of themselves in distant lands to remind the inhabitants of who rules the land, and the practice of referring to those kings as the image or representation of the gods. In short, the ancient context for image was a legitimization of the divine power of kings and the subjugated nature of the people. The king, as the image of god, demanded the loyalty and service of the people, primarily in terms of their economic production. Genesis, however, subverts that view completely by stating that all people are created in the image of God. There is no divine prerogative of rulers here - all people have been granted authority to rule, to subdue and order the earth in keeping with the task assigned by God. In short, a theology of vocation has its beginnings here, with the granting of authority to continue the divine task of creation.

This, then, stands in sharp critique of the current elevation of the Market as the driving force behind suburban lifestyles. Human worth, human dignity, is not predicated on one's ability to produce and to consume. Human dignity comes from the divine task and the corresponding authority to carry out that task - the care of Creation itself. Economics - the Market - is a tool that, when used well, can help further the pursuit of that task. Nothing more.

This deserves a longer treatment. I offer these thoughts as a humble beginning of what I think is an absolutely significant and critical line of thinking that needs to be taken up by those of us in suburban contexts. But there is a practical connection as well. The Christian tradition, and the Jewish tradition from which it grew, offers a key practice that in and of itself critiques the dominance of the economic sphere. I am, of course, thinking of the practice of Sabbath keeping. Sabbath places bounds on the economic realm - it declares, on the one hand, that we are free from service to the Market, and on the other, that we are dependent on God. Sabbath breaks the rhythm of producing and consuming that defines life in suburbia and carves out sacred space in keeping with the praxis of God Himself. Is it any wonder that Sabbath is so rarely practiced, or that we who struggle to practice it are so much at the mercy of the Market? Keeping Sabbath is part of what it means to be human - to rest, to worship, and to be free from the domination of the Market.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by Scott on 10:49 PM in Contextual Theology, Praxis
Email this post | Bookmark this post on del.icio.us
Trackbacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.theopraxis.net/cgi-bin/MT/mt-Ping.cgi/289.

Theolpraxis: Theology of the Suburbs
Scott Berkhimer of Theopraxis and MereMission is in suburban Philadelphia. He has offered (so far) a series of posts on A Theology of the Suburbs. I've been enjoying his thoughts and felt I should provide a central location for these
Received from Reformissionary on April 26, 2006 03:40 PM
Comments

Wow, great post, Scott! I don't have anything to add or any questions to ask (at the moment), but this was incredibly thought-provoking. Thanks!

Actually, I do have a tangentially-related question, which maybe you could answer in new post if you have the time and are interested. I was reading the Wikipedia entry on Prometheus, when I came across this statement:

"While his brother was making creatures, Prometheus was carefully crafting a creature after the shape of the gods. It was a human."

So I am curious... If Greeks also believed that man was made in the image of the divine, how does this (if at all) inform our understanding of the similar concept in Jewish literature? You've read a lot more on the imago dei than I have - has anyone that you've read addressed this?

Posted by Jared Coleman on April 18, 2006 10:13 AM

Scott.

This was a great series of posts. I absolutely loved it. I agreed with a lot disagreed with some (I laughed, I cried) but all of it was extremely thought provoking, convicting, challenging, etc. Exactly the kind of reflective thinking a wannabe suburban pastor like myself needs to participate in.

This last post of yours reminds me of the take that Rob Bell has on the commandment to "remember the sabbath." In contrast to the economics of Egypt that determined value based on how many bricks you could produce, the economics of God place value in our being created in his image. So we could "afford" to take a day off from brick making because God took a day off from his work in creation. In other words, the "command" to remember the sabbath is really an invitation to be like God. I think that simply proclaiming this type of economic understanding of this command (and the command to not steal) would go a long way in capturing the imagination of suburban Christians.

Can I tell you how much I appreciate you sharing your thoughts and theological reflections with the rest of us?? I, for one, greatly appreciate you open-sourcing your theological education.

James

Posted by James Mills on April 19, 2006 12:03 AM

Jared - it's an interesting parallel. I haven't read anyone commenting on it, primarily because (I would guess) that the context for the OT is more the Egyptian or Mesopotamian uses. I'm not sure if the Greek version carries the same meaning in the sense of the royal connotations of the Mesopotamian usage - it would be interesting to do a bit more reading on that. In any case, it's likely (as I understand it) that the OT authors wouldn't have encountered the Greeks until after the Pentateuch was compiled, so I think there's probably something else going on there.

James - glad you enjoyed! I have a couple more posts up my sleeve on this, which I'm going to try to complete by the end of the week. Hopefully more to agree with. ;)

In other words, the "command" to remember the sabbath is really an invitation to be like God.
This is well said. I think you're exactly right about the effects that this could have on those of us in suburban contexts if we'd allow it to shape us.

Posted by ScottB on April 19, 2006 09:45 AM

Scott - Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for the answer.

Posted by Jared Coleman on April 19, 2006 02:09 PM

Great post Scott. I will be digesting this for some time to come. Thanks.

Posted by Joel on April 21, 2006 08:44 PM

fantastic post!

"This means, simply, that the way in which suburbanites think about happiness is primarily defined in terms of economics."

Amen.

I'm reading more on the Imperial Cult, and you are distilling the same thought that drove John to reveal his apocalypse in such the way he did (I believe). It is also my belief that alot of the NT comparison was enabled by the exodus and syrio-palestinian history. This would definately qualify.

Man, if I could think as clearly and linearly as you do for one day...

you da bomb!

Posted by chris on April 26, 2006 03:01 PM

Aw, shucks! ;)

What's on your bookshelf at the moment? I think there are a lot of parallels to the imperial cult in consumer capitalism, based on what I've read thus far (mostly Wright and Horsley, plus Colossians Remixed). I'd love to get my hands on something that delves into primary sources more extensively - the stuff I've been reading has done a bit of that, but it's been only a part of a larger discussion, so it hasn't been enough to satisfy my curiosity there.

Posted by ScottB on April 26, 2006 09:26 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?