November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Search


Archives
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Meta

Get Firefox!

Crazy Relatives

I've been following the insanity this evening over the emergentno.com aggregator that Justin Baeder pulled together. I'm at this point exhausted, primarily because reading too much fundagelical stuff is bad for my blood pressure.

I had this bizarre experience a number of years ago at my uncle's house. We were visiting for Thanksgiving, and his wife's brother was also at the table with the rest of the family. The problem was that this guy was a total ass. Not only was he ignorant (and displayed it proudly), but he was also loudly and vocally prejudiced. I was embarrassed to be in the same room; I can't imagine how my uncle must have felt.

I guess we all probably have relatives that embarrass us. I bet that, if this guy got to know me, he'd think I was an arrogant, know-it-all city boy. And he'd probably have a point, as far as that goes.

I think what I find so thoroughly frustrating about this whole emergent-no, emergent-yes thing is the division that it causes. I say this as someone who can't read some of these sites without mentally dropping the f-bomb (for which I recognize that I am in need of repentance). In other words, it's easy to cry foul about division in the body while your hands are full of rocks and your aim is good. But on some level, these people are family - as troubling and as embarrassing as that might be. On the other hand, they are (obviously) just as embarrassed about me.

Here's the challenge - I think of my natural response to this sort of thing, and I think of Christ's commands to do good to those who hate you, and I realize that I'm not very much like Him. I get angry and sin not. And the thing that is most frustrating is that unity gets trampled underfoot, and we continue to perpetuate the brokenness of the curse instead of living in the new life of Christ. I'm not saying that we shouldn't disagree - there are some foundational differences between folks that would be helpful for all of us to sort out. Maybe in the end we won't agree anyway - but can we at least do so in a manner that doesn't call into question someone else's place at the table?

I was going to do my review of Colossians Remixed tonight, but now I'm just tired.

Posted by Scott on 10:59 PM in Emerging Church
Email this post | Bookmark this post on del.icio.us
Comments

Like a moth drawn to the flame I'm continually drawn in to fire of EmergentNo.

Posted by Leighton Tebay on November 16, 2005 08:16 AM

Leighton, I have to give you a ton of credit - I read your comments and interactions over there, and I think you're representing the best of Christian charity. I think it's folks like yourself, RobbyMac, and Jamie (for example) who have contributed to what looks like a slight (ever so slight) softening of the rhetoric over there. At least there's been constructive dialogue lately, which is a step in the right direction.

Posted by ScottB on November 16, 2005 08:48 AM

man o man, this post brings a lot of thoughts to mind.

the disagreements and the discourse can prove valuable.. but only if there's some momentum along the way -- as if perhaps, we're both serving in a soup line, and we disagree on which part of the tray the green beans should go on, so we decide to talk about it after lunch, and so, people are still getting served and moving through the line. people are still being fed.

it really can be that simple.

too much coffee, again. thanks for a great post, my friend.

Posted by so i go on November 16, 2005 06:07 PM

The issue I see at the core of this whole emergent-no, emergent-yes argument is worldview. It's almost pathological, the sum of our experience and internalized messages predispose us to react in a certain way. The problem is that no amount of arguing or slander is going to change, absolutely, the position of another who differs in view. Only the Holy Spirit can do that (or perhaps arguing can in a simple common sense type discourse, which this most certainly is not - much to the chagrin of the non emergent). When and where the Spirit decides to alter pathologies is a mystery and one that Paul struggled with. If it were a matter of words, then we would most certainly have far fewer epistles and perhaps no Gospels at all.

For my money, I'd love to see us no's and yes's drop the faceless writing in opposition and spend a week in mission together serving and singing heartfelt choruses of "Kumbayah" into the wee hours of morning.


At that point we may all see together one church, emerged.

Posted by chris on November 17, 2005 09:30 AM

Jeff, I keep asking myself whether I should be reading this stuff. Is it a distraction or is it something else? I don't know yet. I've tried to have a few productive conversations with folks who disagree, but I haven't yet had one make it far enough to be productive.


Chris - I'm with you on that vision. Heck, I'd be happy to continue to disagree as long as we can respect the other perspective. I'd just prefer to not be called "demon possessed", you know? ;)

Faceless is a good way to put it, and probably a lot of the problem.

Posted by ScottB on November 18, 2005 01:09 AM

Last night I was speaking to an older friend of mine about how she was raised in the midst of holiness theology in the UMC. Her mother was one of nine children and the only one who did not accept the teaching of this second grace, this total sanctification. They actually took their children to movie houses. *The horror!* The rest of the family thought they were on their merry way to hell.

As the years went by, however, a difference became evident in the cousins' lack of discernment and apathy toward God and my friend's family's passion for following Christ and doing the work of God. No one understood it. But in the midst of the pain of hurting families, they began to come and ask questions and seek help from the very people they had condemned.

We won't achieve unity overnight. It's the work of our lives. Pray, weep, love - and let us not become weary in doing good. Our brothers and sisters, and indeed the nations of the world, are worth it.

Peace, brother.

Posted by Scott L on November 18, 2005 02:37 PM

At the risk of sounding like a shameless hussy of self-promotion, I chimed in with my own comments to the post, "Regarding Absolute Truth" on the emergent-no site. Scroll down. Scroll waaaaaaaay down.

Yeah, I know, just what we needed, right? More commentary - like the world hasn't got enough already. It's not that the discussion isn't valuable, I'm just wondering if there aren't other investment vehicles out there with consistently higher rates of return.

But then, what do I know? I'm a shameless hussy!

Posted by [rhymes with kerouac] on November 19, 2005 06:38 PM


I commend you all for your bravery :)
I don't have the energy or the patience I'm afraid, and probably too sensitive too if I'm honest :(

1 Cor is a great Epistle it talks about not causing brothers to stumble, (10:27) it calls for unity in the body and most of all it talks about LOVE. that is what I long for that I could disagree in love. Right now I find that hard, if not impossible, so better to keep my BP under control and keep quiet :)

hope you aren't so tired now
REST in the Lord and find our HIS DIRECTIONS :)

be blessed

Posted by Lorna on November 20, 2005 03:18 PM

as one banned from e'no I know how you feel.

Do I walk away?...

i wish I could!

Posted by Andrew Hamilton on November 20, 2005 06:23 PM

Apologies for the delay in responding to your thoughts (see next post).

Scott - good thoughts. Great ones, actually - the long term view is significant. I was having a discussion with some folks in my MDiv cohort this weekend about the emerging church. A few people voiced the question of whether this thing is even going to be around in twenty years or so. And that's a good question, I think - is this just a flash in the pan or is there something of substance here? I think (and hope) the concerns of contextualization, mission, community, and kingdom will remain, whatever the form.

[rhymes] - excellent thoughts you posted. I wonder if anyone will respond? I guess one reason to keep pushing the discussion is that for a lot of folks in the more, um, traditional/conservative streams (not the best characterization, but I can't think of a better one) the issues you raised there aren't kingdom issues. Sad but true, and I know I'm not telling you anything you don't know - not to generalize, but I think it's a fair statement with the recognition that there are certainly exceptions. But as for that "higher rate of return" - I ponder that every time I wade into one of these discussions. It usually results in my exit within a week or so.

Lorna - a wise decision, I think. ;)

Hamo - I actually remember that whole fiasco in the early days of e-no. It's that whole "train wreck" sensibility that keeps us all coming back for more, I think. ;)

Posted by ScottB on November 21, 2005 09:21 AM

Note: Trackpack spam above...

Posted by Justin on November 27, 2005 04:22 PM