What's in a Name?
In exploring the biblical themes of social responsibility, I had next thought to look at the Wisdom literature and prophets, but I want to take a brief pause to consider something that I think is rather significant in the Creation narrative that plays off of the idea of justice. This might be somewhat brief, but I think it's worth the detour because, if I'm right in how I'm reading this, it grounds the idea of injustice in the narrative of the Fall. This isn't news; obviously mistreatment of any kind is a fruit of sin and not of righteousness. But I think there's a subtle hint in the actual narrative itself of what is to come.
If we read through the account in Genesis 2 of Adam naming the animals and, following, the creation of the woman, we get a sense that there is an equality, a sharing, a completion that happens when the woman comes on the scene. We hear the amazement in Adam's voice as he speaks of her as "bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh," the wonder of who God has created to share his life. We hear echoes of chapter 1 when we are told that God created humans in God's image as both male and female, and we get a sense that together they are in the image of God moreso than either on his or her own. To that end, when Adam calls her "woman", there is a sense of honor and beauty and wonder at this one who is like and yet unlike, and amazing for being so.
Names are powerful things. Names mean things - anyone who fails to understand why things like inclusive language are significant probably fails to understand the significance of names. Names are signs of authority; if I can name you, I in some sense have a power over you, a power to grant life or choke it. Anyone who has been on the receiving end of either a powerful blessing of a great name or a terrible burden of a shameful one knows what I mean. I try always to speak to my boys in words that give life, because I never want them to grow up under the pain and shame of an identity crafted out of harsh words. Most times I succeed, and for the times that I fail I pray for God's grace.
Adam, I think, fails miserably in chapter 3. After all of the wretched happenings of the narrative, we get this one small comment that carries tremendous significance - "Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living." Here, I think, is the first fruit of broken relationship of the Fall. Although Adam has called her "woman" before, now he names her personally, in essence claiming the position of domination that she has been cursed to live under. By naming her, he says in no uncertain terms that he has authority over her. And notice that the name he chooses in this particular context reflects closely what she has been cursed to bear - her name will remind her always of the pain that she must face as a result of their sin.
So what does this have to do with justice? I think that in some sense we see here that the immediate fruit of sin in the context of the narrative is the domination of one person over another. It is a fruit that we carry, each of us, to this day. When we act in ways that proclaim domination, we perpetuate the fruit of the curse. When we act in ways that proclaim submission and service, we proclaim the Kingdom, something that we won't truly begin to see in the biblical narrative until the coming of the second Adam, who breaks the curse and calls us back to full humanity.
"When we act in ways that proclaim submission and service, we proclaim the Kingdom..."
I couldn't possibly agree more. Submission and service, however, are laborious and heartbreaking, and are ineffective without the death of one's personal ambitions, desire for status and, dare I say it, 'self'.
This is why thousands upon thousands of Lazarus' children lie at the gates, day in and day out. Let's face it, evangelistic crusades are just way easier, and everybody goes home happy.
Oops, sorry...did that sound bitter?
Posted by rhymes with kerouac on April 2, 2005 03:39 PMI could blog for months on this one comment alone. I think you are so, so right and it breaks my heart to think what we've done to the gospel. We innoculate people to it, give them just enough so that they get the picture of getting their individual behinds into heaven while the rest of the world goes to hell. All you have to do is look at a church's budget and schedule to know who they serve - and too often that's not "the least of these" (and hence by extension not Jesus either).
Posted by ScottB on April 2, 2005 11:06 PMreally great thoughts scott - do you think we're ever going to get this on 'earth as it is in heaven'??
Posted by bobbie on April 3, 2005 07:32 PMYeah, that's the thing, isn't it? We're new creations and all, those of us who have been brought into the Kingdom, but it sure seems like we brought a lot of the old with us. I remember a book floating around the church I attended about five years ago or so that talked about how since we're not under the curse anymore that women shouldn't have to endure pain in childbirth and all (if they had enough "faith", I'll resist the urge to beat on THAT drum for a while). But I thought to myself, "Hmm, seems to me like work still sucks and is often meaningless and frustrating, so I'm not really tracking here."
Anyway - point being that I really think that eschatology is such a huge deal for Kingdom minded folks but we do such a crappy job of it. So do I think we'll get it on earth as it is in heaven? I hope so - capital-H hope, as in if there isn't an end of the story where all things are made new and right and clean and beautiful then I think I'm in the wrong story. I don't know how that's going to happen, even if the LaHays do, because their version doesn't sound like hope to me. Until that happens, however it so pleases God to do so, I think we're going to live in that in-between place where sometimes the Kingdom comes and we do what is right and become human agan, and sometimes we miss the bus and are something less. But every time we "get it," I think the Kingdom gets just a little bit closer.
My thoughts, anyway...
Posted by ScottB on April 3, 2005 09:43 PM
